JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
8 April 2003 (1)
(Approximation of laws - Directives 84/450/EEC and 97/55/EC - Misleading advertising - Conditions for comparative advertising to be lawful)
In Case C-44/01,
REFERENCE to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between
Pippig Augenoptik GmbH & Co. KG
and
Hartlauer Handelsgesellschaft mbH,
Verlassenschaft nach dem verstorbenen Franz Josef Hartlauer,
on the interpretation of Council Directive 84/450/EEC of 10 September 1984 on misleading and comparative advertising (OJ 1984 L 250, p. 17), as amended by Directive 97/55/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 October 1997 (OJ 1997 L 290 p. 18),
THE COURT,
composed of: G.C. Rodr